EVGA GTX 960 SuperSC SweetSpot Plus Style

Testing & Methodology

It’s best to talk expectations on lower tier enthusiast upper tier mainstream GPU’s.before getting into the test results portion. I mentioned it earlier the MSI GTX 960 is a card in the $200 – 240 dollar range and has about half the hardware of a GTX 980 or for that matter a 970 and shouldn’t be held to those standards. The much narrower memory bus will keep the 960 class cards from competing with their big brothers. What I decided to do since this is a replacement card for the GTX 760 and older cards is to first test against a 560ti and a 660ti then up the ante and test against a PowerColor R9 285 and a 760 that way you get a look at what you get replacing an older card and what you see replacing a newer card.

Test Rig

Benchmarks

I did a fresh load of the Windows 8.1 operating system, completely updated it from windows update. I do a no external driver load of Windows, no GPU, fancy mouse, or for that matter any driver other than for the Motherboard. I then clone the drive using Acronis keeping a clean copy for the next GPU or in case of catastrophic drive failure. Each GPU gets a clean install and clean drivers with no previous installs that way. I run each test 5 times and take an average of those 5 runs, if one run should be an anomaly  (obviously out of the expected range as set by the other 4 runs) I rerun the test and throw out the problematic run.  Benchmarks with built-in auto benching I run normally, Games with Fraps I go to a heavily enemy infested area pause kick in a Macro creator run the enemy infested area then stop Fraps then stop the Macro creator. The macro creator is then used in every Fraps run to run the same exact pattern 4 more times. Every game has a save point, every game uses a custom Macro to recreate the 5 runs ensuring from game to game and GPU to GPU the runs are exactly the same run.