Crucial BX100 256GB

AS SSD

We turn to AS SSD to look at the drive’s performance at incompressible data. The Silicon Motion 2246 controller does not do any data compression so its performance should largely mimic to what we have seen with the Iometer.

AS_SSD_4KRead

The random read for the BX100 is just a tad behind the MX100 and falling just behind the Samsung 850 EVO.

AS_SSD_4K-64KThrdRead

The performance difference between the BX100 and the MX100 has widened where the BX100 is trailing the MX100 by 17% as the threads increase.

AS_SSD_4KWrite

AS_SSD_4K-64KThrdWrite

Random write for the BX100 is a bit weak where it is 10% slower than the MX100. However, higher thread has the BX100 coming in slightly ahead with 293.77 MB/s compare to the 280.24 MB/s from the MX100.

AS_SSD_SequentialRead

AS_SSD_SequentialWrite

The sequential read for the BX 100 is excellent, taking the top spot here. Though the sequential write is in the middle of the pack with 368 MB/s. It is, however, 10% faster than the MX100’s.

Crystal DiskMark 3.0.3 x64

Crystal_DishMark_4k_Read  Crystal_DishMark_4k_Read_QD32

Crystal_DishMark_4k_Write  Crystal_DishMark_4k_Write_QD32

Crystal_DishMark_Sequential_Read   Crystal_DishMark_Sequential_Write

Crystal_DishMark_512k_Read  Crystal_DishMark_512k_Write

The Crucial BX100 scored 5395 points with the PCMark 7 storage test. It is 52 points higher than the MX100. It is clearly faster than older mainstream drive from two years ago but not as fast as some of the drives such as Samsung 850 EVO.

Check Also

Cooler Master Masterliquid PL360 Flux

Jump to section 3. Cooler Master MasterPlus+ 1. Introduction2. Installation3. Cooler Master MasterPlus+4. Testing and …

Geforce Now and the Apple Mac Book Pro (M1 Pro) – a match made in heaven?

Jump to section 3. The Performance 1. Nvidia GeForce Now – the basics2. The software3. …

Leave a Reply

Camping Tent