OCZ RD400 (512GB) PCIe MVM2 M.2 SSD

Benchmark Results: IOmeter

We tested the OCZ RD400 with the official driver instead of the Windows built-in driver. In addition, we ran the test with the included PCIe adapter since that is how the drive is shipped in the retail package.

Random Read

OCZ_RD400_Random_Read_IOPS

We start off with the random read performance. The RD400 scaled quite well with number of queue depth. Notice the IOPS increases almost linearly along with the number of queue depth until we reach the queue depth of 16 where the drive reached its theoretical speed limit of 190,000 IOPS. We are able to achieve 250K IOPS at a queue depth of 32, but it is clear that the increase in the IOPS has waned after queue depth of 16.

OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Read_Q1

Typical desktop workloads is only a few queue depth so we include the queue depth 1 and 4 result here to compare the result with other drives. The RD400 performs quite similar to other OCZ drives that we have reviewed over the last couple of years. The drive’s random read at queue depth of 1 is about average. At such low queue, the additional bandwidth from PCIe is not going to come in handy as the controller, firmware and the NAND would have a much higher impact on the performance. It is unfortunate to see that the latest Toshiba controller is not as capable as Samsung’s drive.

OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Read_Q3

Cranking up the queue depth to 4 and we can see the RD400 is much more competitive here. Still, the drive is still falling behind a couple of SATA drives on the market.

OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Read_QD32

Luckily at queue depth of 32, the additional bandwidth from PCIe shows its benefit. Here, the RD400 is able to manage beating out all of the SATA drives.

Random Write

OCZ_RD400_Random_Write

Random write shows that the RD400 reached its maximum rating of 120,000 IPOS at queue depth of 4 and maintained similar performance throughout the rest of the queue depth. There is a small drop in the performance at queue depth of 16 and 32.

OCZ_RD400_RW_QD32

We include the queue depth 32 random write result here in order to show the random write performance fluctuation. As you can see, the drive’s write speed varies from 80K to 130K. Overall, the drive manages to deliver decent IOPS that hovers around 100K.

OCZ_SSD_Utility

During the intensive write test, the drive reached 67°C as reported by the OCZ SSD Utility. We do not think that thermal throttling affected the drive’s performance fluctuation, as we observed the fluctuation even at early stages of writing when the drive is relatively cool. Thus, the performance most likely is due to the controller and firmware and not heat. Still, reaching 68°C does make us wonder whether it would potentially be an issue without the additional cooling offered by the PCIe add-on card when it is installed in an ultrabook where thermal constraints would cause the drive to hit higher temperatures.

OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Write_Q1

Despite the fluctuation, random write at a low queue depth is still the RD400’s strength for a client drive where the drive is capable of delivering excellent results without the need of any caching mechanism that is employed by Samsung’s 850 EVO.

OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Write_Q3

At queue depth of 4, the RD400 manages to edge out any SATA SSDs on the market with 491 MB/s. This is 50% faster than any SATA SSD can offer.
OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Write_QD32

The story continues at queue depth of 32 where the drive manages to deliver nearly 2x the performance over SATA drives.

Sequential Read
OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Sequential_Read_Q1

The sequential read for the RD400 is impressive because not only does it manage to offer the best result among the SSDs we have tested from OCZ, it is also delivering over 1000 MB/s of transfer rate, even at queue depth of 1.

OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Sequential_Read

Higher queue depth is were the drive’s additional bandwidth comes into play where the drive manages to deliver over 2500 MB/s, close to the company’s rated 2600 MB/s.

OCZ_RD400_Seq_Read

Looking at how the sequential read scales up with the queue depth, we can see that the drive manages to deliver its theoretical transfer rate at a queue depth of 8.  While most client workloads do not utilize more than a couple of queue depth, the drive would not have any trouble delivering great performance in a higher queue depth environment. Even at low queue, we can see the drive still manages to deliver great results with more than three times what a SATA drive can offer.

Sequential Write

OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Sequential_Write_Q1

OCZ_RD400_Iometer_4K_Sequential_Write

Like the random write, the sequential write performance for the RD400 is nothing short of amazing. The drive manages to deliver over 1000 Mb/s at queue depth of 1 and reaches close to its theoretical speed of 1600 MB/s at queue depth of 32.

OCZ_RD400_Seq_Write1

With the sequential write, the RD400 reached its theoretical speed of 1600 MB/s at queue depth of 2. However, there is a small performance drop at queue depth of 8m with a speed around 1400 MB/s and the performance seems to have plateaued afterwards.

Check Also

Nvidia RTX 3080 versus Nvidia RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

2020 and 2021 has so far been an absolute disaster when it comes to getting …

Razer Blade 15 Base Edition (2021)

2020 will go down as a horrible year for getting hold of new graphics card. I still know people who ordered the new Nvidia Series 30 graphics card at launch in September 2020 and still have not been able to receive it. One avenue to get a new Series 30-card might be to go the laptop route instead as it is much easier to get hold of those. Nvidia recently released their RTX 3060, RTX 3070 and RTX 3080-GPU’s for laptop and today I am testing the Razer Blade 15 Base Edition that comes with a Intel i7-10750H, a 15” 165 Hz QHD-screen and a RTX 3070.

One comment

  1. Technology has gone too far in upgrading. Each upgrade, has lots of good things added. Better to choose the best among the bests.

Leave a Reply