ASUS RAMPAGE V Extreme – The Extreme Enthusiasts X99 Board From ASUS Is Here!

Testing & Methodology

We’ve expanded our testing suite considerably since the X79 chipset release, and will continue to use the same methods for most of the motherboards and CPU’s we test. In the interests of thoroughness and accurate results, we run each test at least three times, and some tests more than that. We average the total of all the tests from each benchmark then report the average here.

The OS we use is Windows 7 Pro 64bit with all patches and updates applied. We also use the latest drivers available for the motherboard and any devices attached to the computer. We do not disable background tasks or tweak the OS or system in any way. We turn off drive indexing and daily defragging. We also turn off Prefetch and Superfetch. This is not an attempt to produce bigger benchmark numbers. Drive indexing and defragging can interfere with testing and produce confusing numbers. If a test were to be run while a drive was being indexed or defragged, and then the same test was later run when these processes were off, the two results would be contradictory and erroneous. As we cannot control when defragging and indexing occur precisely enough to guarantee that they won’t interfere with testing, we opt to disable the features entirely.

Prefetch tries to predict what users will load the next time they boot the machine by caching the relevant files and storing them for later use. We want to learn how the program runs without any of the files being cached, and we disable it so that each test run we do not have to clear pre-fetch to get accurate numbers. Lastly we disable Superfetch. Superfetch loads often-used programs into the memory. It is one of the reasons that Windows occupies so much memory. Vista fills the memory in an attempt to predict what users will load. Having one test run with files cached, and another test run with the files un-cached would result in inaccurate numbers. Again, since we can’t control its timings so precisely, it we turn it off. Because these four features can potentially interfere with benchmarking, and are out of our control, we disable them. We do not disable anything else.

One thing to note is that we are revamping our testing method in order to better represent motherboard performance and offering to you guys the consumer. Also we want to make it an easier read for you without miles of endless charts. Please feel free to provide feedback on what you think as many benchmarks will be shuffled or removed completely.

Test Rig

Test Suite

We will use the following applications to test the performance of the Motherboard, Processor

NOTE!  Due to the early nature of the platform we have seen some very strange results form the platform on some benchmarks and have been told that updates to the benchmarks will be made to make them more compatible so stay tuned for future board reviews for better idea on scoring

Overclocking

For overclocking I only had one sample this go around and I had a kind of pre warning from ASUS that the common clock is between 4.4-4.6 on air/water on these chips with some exceptional samples pulling 4.7GHz capable without going extreme cooling.

Here you can see taht while the Rampage could not push me above and beyond what the chip limit is, I could definitely wrangle some much higher Uncore speeds which capped out at 4250MHz. Now this does translate to some real performance in benching and it is worth noting that the Rampage V Extreme is the only board I could achieve these cache speeds on so far so it is possible that the OC Socket may have something going on.

Here you can see a breakdown of the voltages applied to reach the  target speed, but do note that I cannot verify if the voltages will match every CPU only time will tell how well each chip scales with settings but if history has taught us anything its that CPUs can vary by alot so dont expect to just plug in my exact setting and run well, but maybe this will help give you a baseline to start from.

 Our memory for overclock testing was some very nice 3GHz modules from the team over at GSkill, and we greatly appreciate their support to make sure we could push the limits of the rampage board in our OC testing

When testing overclock for memory the GSkill units pulled 3GHz no problem but manipulating the BCLK and straps trying to get higher became a lesson in futility as the chip didnt want to play with higher so I plan to pick up another chip in retail form soon to test my theory as far as my memory clock limit I am seeing.

Now as we head into the uncore testing do note that I tested from stock 3GHz uncore up to its max to see how it affects benchmark and memory performance.

The CPU was locked at a static 4.5GHz for all testing to ensure the CPU should not be a bottleneck for this performance increase testing.

Uncore Clocking 3000MHz Uncore

Uncore Clocking 3500MHz Uncore

Uncore Clocking 4000MHz Uncore

Uncore Clocking 4275MHz Uncore

As you can see here the scaling with uncore shows that small steps of performance gain can be had but still more so I may end up getting a K chip to see if at higher clock speeds on the core the Uncore increases may see better gains.

I do have to give credit where credit is due and it seems to happen every chipset generation as the ASUS ROG engineers seem to unlock some special potential to pull off feats like this and I can say with absolute certainty that this board is the only one I have been able to get this kind of uncore performance from however I have seen rumors of other manufacturers using a OC socket design as well so we will have to see if they gain the same fruitful results as time goes on.

Important note: Overclocking can cause component failure. Please exercise caution when attempting any level of overclock on system components.

Temperatures

The temperatures were recorded with RealTemp while running wPrime 1024 right before the end of the 5th run. The results were recorded carefully. After the results were recorded, we waited for 30 minutes before taking Idle temperature measurements. The results were as follows:

The Water 3.0 ultimate with it large surface area 360mm radiator keeps the CPU plenty cool.

PCmark 7

With Futuremark benchmarks it was a mess at launch and has been betetr now but still for PCMark 7 it seems to give results lower especially in computation for X99, but be that as it may the Rampage does well here but the EVGA Classified board does beat its OC score in the computation department.

AIDA64

AIDA64 simply tests the memory and gives you raw input on performance for the memory bus and installed DIMMS. as you can see the new X99 platform with DDR4 can pull some massive bandwidth numbers but I was also a little shocked as to the high 70ns latency result. The Rampage has a 70ns latency result which is a bit behind the EVGA board but the read and copy results much higher.

Handbrake

Handbrake is a free program used for transcoding video files. For this we used a 4K video file and ran it down to 1080 while manually keeping count of the time it took to process this via the CPU. as you can see when compared to the 4960X the new 5960X jumps far ahead and even almost halves the time once overclocked. Do note that the extra 4 threads will definitely help with this as the program utilizes all cpu threads when running the encoding operation.

3DMark 11

3DMark 11 shows relative synthetic gaming level performance and on Xtreme preset you can see that the Rampage slightly eeks past the Classified model.

SuperPi

This tests single threaded performance and clock efficiency by processing digits of the number pi. Here you can see that single threaded performance is not groundbreaking as it is beat out by the 4960X but I am very interested to see what a few BIOS updates will bring. The Rampage extreme at stock values runs circles around the classified and is met by the Xpower but at the 1m test is pretty much faster than all other X99 competitors which speaks well to its tuning out of the box, however when overclocked it does seem to lose a step in the transition.

Wprime

WPrime is similar to Superpi, but is multi core aware and you can set the core count. The 5960X with its 16 processing threads makes easy work of Wprime and with the Rampage V Extreme you see a sub 3 second 32M calculation which is no simple task. Actually the 32m test is the fastest of the bunch again as the Rampage seems to be strong at quick jaunts but the sustained long tests it once again loses a little ground.

Cinebench R11.5

X264HD

Transcoding has become more popular now and the latest Sandy Bridge and on processors added support for AVX instruction for faster video transcoding. Here again the 5960X is proving itself to be a work horse in these heavy loaded tasks as it chews thru them and gives scores higher than we have seen come through our test bench for any consumer part to date.

Truecrypt 7.1

TrueCrypt is a real world application that gives a good indication of the true performance of our latest processor. The AES capability helps push the performance higher in the encryption performance and the super high core count with overclock added gives us out first double digit result in truecrypt on a consumer part. as you can see the outgoing 4960X is easily beaten by 2GB/s stock vs stock which is a huge performance increase.

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Unigine Heaven is a benchmark program based on Unigine Corp’s latest engine, Unigine. The engine features DirectX 11, Hardware tessellation, DirectCompute, and Shader Model 5.0. All of these new technologies combined with the ability to run each card through the same exact test means this benchmark should be in our arsenal for a long time.

Unigine Heaven on a discrete GTX 780 sees very similar performance as the 3.0 PCIe bus simply moves more than enough data at great efficiency that there is really no major advantage from extra threads here. The thread count and even overclock does little to help here as its simply outgunned by the gamers dream 4790K chip.

Metro 2033

Metro 2033 shows that the minimum FPS is quite low but that could be a bug that disappears as the platform matures. overall the average FPS holds well in the range of the others

Batman Arkham City

Batman Arkham City has been a staple of our benchmarking suite and its simply because its a fun game to play, its popular and offers many excellent technologies which puts a system to work. Here you can see that at stock the 4790K beats the average FPS against the X99 but when overclocked the X99 can pull ahead some but by the same token im sure the 4790K when overclocked could pull away some as well.

Sniper Elite V2

The Sniper Elite V2 shows similar scaling across the board offering well over playable FPS results but the X99 does not jump ahead in any way.